From: Ilya Korobkov (korobkov_ilya@mail.ru)
Date: Sun Sep 05 2004 - 07:48:15 BST
Dear Wim,
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 12:09:22 AM, you wrote:
WN> The self we experience is only the conscious part of our patterns of value:
WN> only part of the 4th level patterns of value we identify with.
WN> Aren't there scores of psychological schools that distinguish different
WN> (conscious and sub/unconscious) selves instead of one whole one (and that
WN> try to convince people that they consist of multiple selves contrary to
WN> their experience)?
You are certainly right. Still, in my opinion, the question remains.
How does MOQ explain which patterns become conscious and which remain
sub/unconscious? Which contribute to conscious self and which do not?
And by the way, who is "we" in your first sentence? - Ok, I am most
willing to admit this is just a figure of speach. Then, how would you
rephrase this sentence so that it would be literally correct?
Best regards,
Ilya
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 05 2004 - 07:50:06 BST