Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science

From: Scott Roberts (jse885@earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Sep 05 2004 - 16:46:05 BST

Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD interaction between levels - ?"

Previous message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Pirsig a nominalist?"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Steven Heyman: "MD MOQ and Logic/Science"
Next in thread: MarshaV: "Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science - Rupert Sheldrake"
Reply: MarshaV: "Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science - Rupert Sheldrake"
Reply: David Morey: "Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

David M,

> that book is in my pile too, a big influence on
> Sheldrake apparently. Rupert Sheldrake has read both of Pirsig's
> books too! So he is in the Lila squad.

My view is that the MOQ can benefit more from Sheldrake than Sheldrake from
the MOQ. And both would benefit from Coleridge and Barfield.

- Scott

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD interaction between levels - ?"
Previous message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Pirsig a nominalist?"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Steven Heyman: "MD MOQ and Logic/Science"
Next in thread: MarshaV: "Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science - Rupert Sheldrake"
Reply: MarshaV: "Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science - Rupert Sheldrake"
Reply: David Morey: "Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 05 2004 - 17:43:45 BST