From: Richard Loggins (brloggins@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Sep 06 2004 - 19:46:49 BST
Hi Anthony,
Great answers from both you and Robert Pirsig. Maybe
they should give Mr. Pirsig an honorary degree fro
doing such a great job :) I have a couple of
confusions though about the Shonenburg Concert
question and answer. If Prisig means that musical
harmony is not the same as MoQ harmony, does this mean
the Schoneberg Concert cannot fit into this paradigm,
or is the question not really answered? Also, do you
agree that mathematical elegance cannot be defined by
any static pattern? Can we not give reasons why some
mathematics is more elegant than others? I really
don't know enough math to say,but if thats true its
very interesting.
Rich
> b. How can a Schonenberg Concert which is
> purposively disharmonic fit into
> this paradigm?
>
> Pirsig: Musical harmony is composed of notes that
> have a fixed mathematical
> relation to one another. The harmony Poincaré
> referred to is mathematical
> elegance that is not defined by any static pattern.
> When the MOQ refers to
> harmony it uses it in Poincaré’s sense.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 06 2004 - 20:10:18 BST