From: ml (mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Thu Sep 09 2004 - 21:36:55 BST
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Ledbury" <jim.ledbury@dsl.pipex.com>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: MD and the LIE DETECTOR test
Jim said:
> Given that "individual" means in essence indivisible and they are trying
> to split you into your characteristics, not to mensh the fact that MOQ
> would say that you operate at intellectual, social, biological (not to
> mention chemical) levels - all often conflicting, maybe we should
> discard this concept, except as a convenient jargon to describe this
> particular nexus of quality perceptions.
<snip>
> "And the employees said 'it is a crock of sh*te and it stinketh'..."
>
mel:
Well stated on the crock o' sh!t&...
on indivisible:
You make an interesting point, which makes me
think about my "work persona" as compared to my
private persona.
While I express only an easy almost laid-back
friendliness at work, and limit who I showmyself
to be, to just those portions of my background
directly applicable to work; I also can draw on other
knowledge and skills at will. (Like showing only one
facet of a gemstone, which behaves one way in the
specific light, but showing no other.)
So, when taking a test, I probably show only what
I feel that day or what I anticipate for that test...
If I don't filter, I will never finish the test as it
truly won't have appropriate answers on it, as
David observed.
The power of selective and dependent filtering
would make such tests that much more off-target.
thanks--mel
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 09 2004 - 21:45:59 BST