Re: MD and the LIE DETECTOR test

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sat Sep 11 2004 - 09:48:13 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD A bit of reasoning"

    get authentic at work? -may as well clear your desk

    DM

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "ml" <mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 9:36 PM
    Subject: Re: MD and the LIE DETECTOR test

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Jim Ledbury" <jim.ledbury@dsl.pipex.com>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:16 AM
    > Subject: Re: MD and the LIE DETECTOR test
    >
    >
    > Jim said:
    >
    > > Given that "individual" means in essence indivisible and they are trying
    > > to split you into your characteristics, not to mensh the fact that MOQ
    > > would say that you operate at intellectual, social, biological (not to
    > > mention chemical) levels - all often conflicting, maybe we should
    > > discard this concept, except as a convenient jargon to describe this
    > > particular nexus of quality perceptions.
    >
    > <snip>
    >
    > > "And the employees said 'it is a crock of sh*te and it stinketh'..."
    > >
    > mel:
    > Well stated on the crock o' sh!t&...
    >
    > on indivisible:
    > You make an interesting point, which makes me
    > think about my "work persona" as compared to my
    > private persona.
    >
    > While I express only an easy almost laid-back
    > friendliness at work, and limit who I showmyself
    > to be, to just those portions of my background
    > directly applicable to work; I also can draw on other
    > knowledge and skills at will. (Like showing only one
    > facet of a gemstone, which behaves one way in the
    > specific light, but showing no other.)
    >
    > So, when taking a test, I probably show only what
    > I feel that day or what I anticipate for that test...
    > If I don't filter, I will never finish the test as it
    > truly won't have appropriate answers on it, as
    > David observed.
    >
    > The power of selective and dependent filtering
    > would make such tests that much more off-target.
    >
    > thanks--mel
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 11 2004 - 09:52:12 BST