Re: MD On Faith

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Thu Oct 14 2004 - 03:54:04 BST

  • Next message: macavity11: "Re: MD On Faith"

    Hi all,

    Though I'm usually shy about expressing my opinion on this list (ask
    anyone), I think I'll jump in here:

    Whomever said "All religions are true" got it half right. All
    religions are false AND true. They are historically and often
    scientifically false whenever they use myth (which is just about all
    the fn time) to point to some very real truths. Myth is used because
    metaphor is more powerful than fact and always has been.

    The confusion you're all struggling with here arises because,
    somewhere in time, whomever introduced you to religion (nay, poured
    religion into your brains) forgot to mention this subtle distinction,
    if even they were aware of it. The result is you have a bunch of
    fully grown adults going around thinking, for example, that some guy
    actually walked on water, multiplied loaves and fishes, was
    crucified, died, and was buried... then rose from the dead. This
    makes for a lot of heavy back unloading of bs in the later years.

    I've often thought this confusion would be avoided if every child was
    taken from his parents at an impressionable age and required by law
    to read Shakespeare.

    Best,
    msh
    --
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com

    "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    everything." -- Henri Poincare'

    On 13 Oct 2004 at 16:27, macavity11 wrote:

    I'm sorry I just don't think you can say anti religion this and anti
    religion that and then talk about the praises of a religion you like-
    just seems too mixed of a message to me and even seems very
    unbuddhistlike for that matter!(is that a word?)
    -
    "God is both one and many. Both in one instant. As anybody who
    knows anything about the Unknowable well knows "God" and "gods" are
    interchangeable. The exclusivistic patriarchal "Jehovah/Allah"
    freaks are not incorrect when they insist that there is one Supreme
    Being and that "he" is immutable and absolute. However, neither are
    the wide-eyed inclusive pagans and primitives wrong when they
    recognize gods of fire alongside gods of rivers; honor a moon
    goddess, a crocodile spirit, and deities who reside in, among
    countless other places, tree trunks:, rain clouds, peyote buttons,
    and neon lighting (especially the flashing whites and greens)"
    Tom Robbins, Villa Incognito

    Erin

    Chuck Roghair <ctr@pacificpartssales.com> wrote:
        
        On Oct 13, 2004, at 8:34 AM, macavity11 wrote:
        
    > But then you say maybe Buddhism can help show the way, but that is
        an
    > old religion.
        
        mu.
        
        However, Buddhism certainly isn't an oppressive monolithic
        institutionalized monotheism bent on world domination.
        
        Best,
        
        C.
        
        
        
        
        MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
        Mail Archives:
        Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
        Nov '02 Onward -
        http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
        MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
        
        To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
        http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 14 2004 - 03:55:14 BST