From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Oct 26 2004 - 02:29:15 BST
ml <mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Hello Erin,
---- Original Message -----
From: Erin
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: MD On Faith
Hi,
There are many "rational" people who think the MOQ is "irrational" and
nothing you have said seems like it would convince them. I wanted you to
explain your argument to a skeptic-----slapping a title "rational
empiricism" I would doubt would convince them.
Can you explain why it is rational empiricism, please.
mel:
It seems that labeling MoQ as either rational or irrational is
rather a SOM-ish position. Fine for a philosophy class but
counter productive for wrapping crenelations of squishy
brain matter around Quality.
Hi,
I am not trying to give you a hard time mel. I am just truly confused at how you distinguish these things. I'm getting dizzy trying to figure out what the heck your argument is.....remind me why you justify your belief in MOQ is not faith with the claim that it falls as RATIONAL empiricism and then with this new statement shun rational label as SOM and seemingly start to describe a realm of beyond understanding which was how you described faith.
Erin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 26 2004 - 02:48:19 BST