From: Charles Roghair (ctr@pacificpartssales.com)
Date: Tue Oct 26 2004 - 04:47:14 BST
Hello mel, Erin, Everybody,
If you don't mind my two cents:
On Oct 25, 2004, at 6:29 PM, Erin wrote:
> Hi,
> I am not trying to give you a hard time mel. I am just truly
> confused at how you distinguish these things. I'm getting dizzy
> trying to figure out what the heck your argument is.....remind me why
> you justify your belief in MOQ is not faith with the claim that it
> falls as RATIONAL empiricism and then with this new statement shun
> rational label as SOM and seemingly start to describe a realm of
> beyond understanding which was how you described faith.
>
> Erin
Chuck's take:
Faith in the MoQ is convenient and, as opposed to inconvenient faith in
God, is not faith in the supernatural. The supernatural is
non-existent as far as the MoQ is concerned; there's no place for it.
The MoQ is is beyond understanding in as much as any metaphysics is
beyond understanding and if you can't understand that you have little
hope of understanding the MoQ.
Or, more succinctly, mu.
Best regards,
Chuck
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 26 2004 - 05:49:05 BST