From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Tue Oct 26 2004 - 14:23:06 BST
On 25 Oct 2004 at 22:27, ml wrote:
> msh says:
> You're confused because you are mixing up responses from two
> different people. MSH is not MEL.
> Mel thinks that rejecting SOM means rejecting rationalism, a
> position so clearly refuted by a variety of contributors to this
> list that it's hard to understand why he still clings to it.
mel:
Not quite sure where you got that from...rejecting the rational?
Hardly, just got to know when to use is and how...
As for "-isms," getting stuck in any is low quality, but then again
we all live to be categorized by you.... ;-)
msh says:
I got that from this:
> mel:
> It seems that labeling MoQ as either rational or irrational is
> rather a SOM-ish position. Fine for a philosophy class but
> counter productive for wrapping crenelations of squishy
> brain matter around Quality."
Thanks,
msh
--
InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
"Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
everything." -- Henri Poincare'
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 26 2004 - 14:32:28 BST