Re: MD On Faith

From: ml (mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Thu Oct 28 2004 - 06:59:55 BST

Previous message: Erin: "MD On Faith"
In reply to: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD On Faith"
Next in thread: Platt Holden: "Re: MD On Faith"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> msh says:
> I got that from this:
>
> > mel:
> > It seems that labeling MoQ as either rational or irrational is
> > rather a SOM-ish position. Fine for a philosophy class but
> > counter productive for wrapping crenelations of squishy
> > brain matter around Quality."

mel:
Well...you missed...not sure where you got lost,
but better luck next time.

thanks--mel

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: ml: "Re: MD On Faith"
Previous message: Erin: "MD On Faith"
In reply to: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD On Faith"
Next in thread: Platt Holden: "Re: MD On Faith"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 28 2004 - 07:06:16 BST