Re: MD On Faith

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Thu Oct 28 2004 - 04:21:33 BST

  • Next message: Erin: "Re: MD On Faith"

    Hi Erin,

    Well, I must admit that I am unable to understand your confusion.

    Science's assumptions are not incorrect, just limited. Science isn't
    opposed to empiricism; it's more like empiricism's materialist little
    brat. Science is concerned only with experience of the measurable
    kind, sticking out its tongue at anything unmeasurable. Rational
    empiricist philosophy embraces all experience, measurable or not.

    Maybe it will help if you focus on the noun "empiricism" rather than
    the adjective "empirical."

    Best,
    Mark (sh)

    On 27 Oct 2004 at 17:55, Erin wrote:

    But the real empirical evidence was what was observable, and the
    reports of experience was what was unobservable. So to distinguish
    the "experiences" you reverted to the scientific sense of the word.
    I still think it is telling that you use the word "real" with what is
    observable. I didn't mean an apology of science. I meant it seems
    like it is an apologyTO science. Shouldn't science be the one
    changing, since it is the one with incorrect assumptions.Again I
    know no field "owns" a word, but empirical for me is associated
    withhow thesciences uses itand they demand for the experience to
    be measured/observed I thought. By adopting the term and stretching
    it to situations I don't think the scientific world would acceptit,
    it just seems apologetic.

    Erin

    Mark Steven Heyman <markheyman@infoproconsulting.com> wrote:
        Me again.
        
        I was distinguishing real empirical evidence from reports of
        experience presented as empirical evidence. Sorry for the
        confusion.
        
        BTW, science requires no apology from me or anyone else. It is an
        incredibly powerful and useful system of thought and investigation.
        Anyone who denies this is simply not paying attention to the world
        around them. My only quibble with science is its lack of interest in
        making value judgements. But that's why we have ethical philosophies
        like the Metaphysics of Quality.
        
        Best again,
        Mark
        

    --
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com

    "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    everything." -- Henri Poincare'

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 28 2004 - 04:22:06 BST