Re: MD Where does quality reside?

From: Richard Loggins (brloggins@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Nov 03 2004 - 14:56:33 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD On Faith"

    Ham,
     
    ham wrote:
    'Yes, it is "poetic license". It is also the resort of a philosopher
    whose theory otherwise defies reason.'
     
    It is as reasonable as reason gets. The world is not run on a single truth.

    ham:
    "The empiricists
    with no belief in a primary source can only explain the purposiveness of
    Nature as an innate force of substance. Thus, they try to present to us the
    idea that "dynamic forces at a subatomic level discover [invent?] stratagems
    for overcoming huge static inorganic forces at a superatomic level." This
    is nonsense, of course, for intellect is subjective and does not exist in
    atoms or molecules at any "level". "

    The above has the MoQ wrong if you are insinuating that it has "no beleaf in a primary source". Of course it does. The MoQ agrees with you that intellect is subjective and does not exist in atoms or molecules. The MoQ goes along with the intellectual patterns that say a atomic and subatomic levels exist but that these are also subject to the purposiveness of DQ. I don't see the problem.
    Rich

                            
    ---------------------------------
    Do you Yahoo!?
     Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com/a

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries -

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 03 2004 - 15:28:42 GMT