From: Richard Loggins (brloggins@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 01:13:02 GMT
Hi Ham,
ham:
"I'm not sure what you mean by denying that the "world runs" on a single
truth. If ultimate reality is the cause of your world, then it represents a
truth."
That's true. That's true. The MoQ agrees with that. What I'm referring to are truths that come after the creation of static quality. Truths are then understood as those things with high quality.
ham:
"F what I understand of MOQ, it does not support a primary source. You folks
have shown Quality to be empirical -- something requiring an observer to
perceive."
That's true, but that doesn't mean Qality requires an observer to EXIST.
ham:
"Richard, if you can show me where Mr. Pirsig says he believes in a primary
source, I'll stand corrected. So far, I've not found it."
I believe he says this in many places throughout Lila and ZMM. He also says in SODV, near the end I think, that Quality is the source of subjects and objects, not the other way around as is commonly believed. This Quality is the primary source.
Rich
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com/a
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 04 2004 - 01:29:31 GMT