From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Sun Nov 07 2004 - 15:49:16 GMT
Hi David M,
> Good point that intellect is seen as having a high value
> only as the 4th of the 4 static levels. I think Sam's problem
> is solved if we look at how we value DQ and then link this
> to how we understand what we mean by human beings.
> I.e. a certain coming together of the 4 levels and DQ into
> an evolving pattern that is a greater whole, a microcosm.
At last, someone prepared to try and stick up for the standard MoQ - or at least explore the
possibility that it does value people as such. However, I seem to recall Pirsig saying that the four
levels and DQ together describe everything there is. Do you think that this 'evolving pattern' fits
into the system, or is this an amendment?
Regards
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 08 2004 - 10:50:06 GMT