From: hampday@earthlink.net
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 01:06:45 GMT
From: Ham Priday
To: Scott Roberts and all
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: MD On Transcendence
Concerning the absence of a Creator (primary source) in the MOQ, Ham said:
> > This omission has nothing to do with the author's desire to avoid
theism,
> > since the God of religion is a "supreme being", and what possesses being
> > exists as an object to be perceived.
> > Isn't Quality also an aspect of
> > objects perceived?
>
Scott replied:
> That's the pre-MOQ view. The MOQ changes this to say that Quality is what
> produces the perceived object (and the perceiving subject)....
Is it your understanding, then, that Quality is pre-conditional,
transcendent, and uncreated? Does Quality presume a prior cause that isn't
cited in the MOQ, or is it a *causa sui* (self-generated) entity? And why
isn't such essential information provided by the author?
--Ham
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 10 2004 - 01:17:49 GMT