Re: MD terror & religion

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Tue Nov 09 2004 - 20:41:43 GMT

  • Next message: hampday@earthlink.net: "ualityRe: MD On Transcendence"

    never had a sublime experience then?

    DM

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ian Glendinning" <ian@psybertron.org>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 1:27 PM
    Subject: Re: MD terror & religion

    >I still don't see any mysticism David.
    > DQ is what you "recognise" between the (currently, temporarily, statically
    > latched) SQ.
    >
    > You "recognise" it because it looks consistent with your existing
    > knowledge
    > and experience, fits and forms a useful predictive model.
    > Common sense, I call it. Pragmatism if you want a label.
    > Same as it ever was.
    >
    > Ian
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "David Morey" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 1:47 PM
    > Subject: Re: MD terror & religion
    >
    >
    >> Ian
    >>
    >> Leaving the gaps open, not covering them over,
    >> staring into Nothing, recognising DQ, seeing the gapping holes
    >> everywhere,
    >> shock at Being, is that not the truth of mysticism.
    >>
    >> DM
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ----- Original Message -----
    >> From: "Ian Glendinning" <ian@psybertron.org>
    >> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:36 PM
    >> Subject: Re: MD terror & religion
    >>
    >>
    >> > From my own obviously enormous knowledge of religions :-)
    >> >
    >> > I would say "Eastern mysticism" is an oxymoron.
    >> > Zen is Eastern, true enough, but seems neither mystical nor religious
    >> > to
    >> > me.
    >> >
    >> > Mysticism ? No way. Anything you have not yet seen or understood is
    > simply
    >> > a
    >> > matter of not yet having looked or thought enough. I'm not aware of any
    >> > "mystical" explanations offerred to plug the gaps. Any gap in knowledge
    > is
    >> > simply that, a gap, an unknown, currently a mystery, but nothing
    >> > necessarily
    >> > mystical. Live with the gap until you find an answer, don't feel
    >> > obliged
    >> > to
    >> > plug it with either faith or rationale (unless working assumptions make
    >> > you
    >> > feel comfortable, but then never forget it was just a working
    > assumption.)
    >> >
    >> > Religion ? Philosophy yes, model or view of the world yes, but religion
    >> > no.
    >> > It does not require you to believe (have faith in) any axioms other
    >> > than
    >> > the
    >> > possibility that you might one day know something by a combination of
    >> > observation and introspection and a respect that those who have
    >> > experienced
    >> > and thought more may actually be wiser than yourself.
    >> >
    >> > Ian
    >> > ----- Original Message -----
    >> > From: "Sam Norton" <elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk>
    >> > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >> > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 9:05 PM
    >> > Subject: Re: MD terror & religion
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >> Hi David,
    >> >>
    >> >> Don't know about attacked, my feeling was exasperation more than
    > anything
    >> > else. The particular quote
    >> >> that got my goat was:
    >> >>
    >> >> "While Eastern mysticism has its fair share of unjustified belief, it
    >> > undoubtedly represents
    >> >> humankind's best attempt at fashioning a spiritual science. The
    >> >> methods
    >> >> of
    >> > introspection one finds
    >> >> in Buddhism, for instance, have no genuine equivalents in the West.
    >> >> And
    >> > the suggestion that they do
    >> >> is born of a desperate attempt on the part of Westerners to make all
    >> > religious traditions seem
    >> >> equally wise. They simply aren't."
    >> >>
    >> >> I just don't think that's a defensible point of view - I can't see a
    >> > better way of describing it
    >> >> than as a prejudice, ie an opinion formed without a full acquaintance
    >> >> with
    >> > the facts of the matter.
    >> >> Not uncommon, but not worth celebrating either.
    >> >>
    >> >> As for a fallible seeking of the truth, I'm with you completely.
    >> >> Certainty
    >> > is the scary thing - but
    >> >> this guy was displaying more than enough certainty for the time being.
    > I
    >> > think there's a very
    >> >> interesting and fruitful discussion to be had, linking the MoQ with
    > what
    >> > is good in the western
    >> >> tradition, but that can only be had when these sorts of prejudices
    >> >> have
    >> > been removed. For as long as
    >> >> they remain there will be more heat than light - and that applies to
    > the
    >> > bombs as well as the words.
    >> >>
    >> >> Regards
    >> >> Sam
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >> ----- Original Message -----
    >> >> From: "David Morey" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
    >> >> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >> >> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 5:17 PM
    >> >> Subject: Re: MD terror & religion
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >> > Hi Sam
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Interesting, do you feel attacked in this interview?
    >> >> > Can you expand upon what is misconceived by the author?
    >> >> > Personally I put a fallible seeking of truth before religion,
    >> >> > and fear the potential violence of those who claim to 'know'
    >> >> > although at this time this seeking places me outside of the
    >> >> > secular camp and its built-in incapacity to face its own
    > inadequacies.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > DM
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >> >> Mail Archives:
    >> >> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >> >> Nov '02 Onward -
    >> > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >> >> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >> >>
    >> >> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >> >> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >> >>
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >> > Mail Archives:
    >> > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >> > Nov '02 Onward -
    >> > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >> > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >> >
    >> > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >> > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >> >
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >> Mail Archives:
    >> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >> Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >>
    >> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 10 2004 - 00:54:09 GMT