From: Dan Glover (daneglover@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 14 2004 - 19:23:21 GMT
Hello everyone
>From: "Sam Norton" <elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
>Subject: Re: MD the worst thing about 9/11 according to the MoQ
>Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:31:20 -0000
>
>
>So I will ask once more: in what way does the MoQ give value to people as
>such, rather than to the
>patterns of value of which people are composed? Despite the torrent of
>words, you haven't answered
>that question.
>
>If anyone else wants to try, I'd be delighted to pursue the matter in a
>more reasonable fashion. In
>the meantime, I shall just be more confirmed that there is a glaring hole
>in the MoQ.
Hi Sam
There seems an assumption behind the question that we (people) in some way
give (assign) objects (people, in this case) value. I think the MOQ finds
this assumption faulty. The MOQ says that people are the patterns, and that
patterns are value. So it seems to me the MOQ doesn't give value to people,
but rather the MOQ says that people ARE value.
So to answer your question: in what way does the MoQ give value to people
as such, rather than to the patterns of value of which people are composed?
I would say it doesn't. The MOQ starts with experience and value grows from
there.
Thank you for your comments,
Dan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 14 2004 - 21:37:08 GMT