Re: MD Empiricism

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 15:55:29 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Roberts: "RE: MD Empiricism"

    Chin:
    It seems we are in agreement, as "reality is undivided and undefinable" 'Is' what I have been trying to say. This is what I call Aristotelian 'Slicing-n-dicing' of the universe. Though we need the subject and object to help us communicate, it really has no meaning, as subject and object can only describe. "Description is not philosophy." -- Shaw (I think) I see the benefit of S&D as long as we recognize its limitations. I see the benefits of science as long as we see its limitations, and I see the benefits of religion, as long as none are excluded.

    DM: Sounds about right to me.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 21 2004 - 17:45:51 GMT