Re: MD People and Value in the MOQ

From: MarshaV (marshalz@i-2000.com)
Date: Mon Nov 22 2004 - 19:08:04 GMT

Next message: mel: "RE: MD Empiricism"

Previous message: MarshaV: "Re: MD People and Value in the MOQ"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Steven Heyman: "MD People and Value in the MOQ"
Next in thread: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD People and Value in the MOQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 11:28 AM 11/22/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>I agree. This "self is an illusion" business makes no sense. How can
>Pirsig and the Buddhists deny they exist without existing? If Pirsig
>denies that when the "self" of his son died it wasn't real and had no
>effect on "himself," then maybe it's time to call for the guys in the
>white coats again.

Or, Picasso is reported to have said, "The Picasso that existed on
Thursday, is not the same Picasso that existed on Monday."

MarshaV

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: mel: "RE: MD Empiricism"
Previous message: MarshaV: "Re: MD People and Value in the MOQ"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Steven Heyman: "MD People and Value in the MOQ"
Next in thread: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD People and Value in the MOQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 22 2004 - 19:37:37 GMT