From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Nov 24 2004 - 13:05:16 GMT
MSH:
> Thanks for a great post!
>
> My only quibble is with the very first paragraph. Although it may
> not be apparent in his post starting this thread, I think it's fair
> to say that the original poster's moral hierarchy does indeed deny
> the supremacy of the intellectual perspective. This is clearly seen
> in the general anti-intellectual tenor of his messages, as well as
> in his desire to rename the Intellectual Level, Individual. IMO, a
> more honest name for his "Individual Level" would be "Randividual,"
> which would also pay more open obeisance to objectivism's "virtue" of
> selfishness.
Heavens forbid, let's not question the "supremacy of the intellectual
level." After all, that's straight from the MOQ.
Didn't I just read somewhere that "reliance on the MOQ for biblical
certainties is telling," and that it's stupid to "demand that all ideas be
supported by literal and direct reference to the MOQ"?
Oh, now I remember. That particular criticism was posted recently by none
other than my good friend MSH.
Reminds me of an old Injun saying, "He speaks with forked tongue." :-)
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 24 2004 - 13:04:50 GMT