From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri Dec 17 2004 - 11:15:39 GMT
Hi Ian,
If you missed the post, the essay is at:
http://www.moq.org/forum/Elizaphanian/schleiermacher/schleiermacher.html
tho' Horse is going to make one final tweak before it gets linked from the main page.
I would precis my argument like this:
- Kant was still working through the 'drama of justification' that he'd inherited from Descartes, in
other words: what are our grounds for certainty?
- his epistemological division between phenomena and noumena was his answer, circumscribing reason
to the phenomena;
- this proved unpalatable to the theologically minded;
- Schleiermacher argued that feelings could give us access to the noumena and called this
'mysticism' (thereby changing the sense of the word 'mysticism');
- the tradition following Schleiermacher emphasises certain metaphysical claims;
- these claims seem to be present in the MoQ;
- it therefore seems to be that the MoQ is still operating within the Kantian epistemological
framework (the conceptual shape is the same as Schleiermacher's).
Hope you find it interesting.
Sam
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 17 2004 - 13:24:24 GMT