Re: MD Mysticism or Cosmic Debris?

From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Sun Dec 19 2004 - 14:11:48 GMT

  • Next message: MarshaV: "Re: MD Mysticism or Cosmic Debris?"

    > However, I'm a little skeptical of the "professional" aspect of the
    > revelation process. Whether it's DMB's recommendation of the web-
    > omnipresent Wilber or Sam's preferred hierarchy of power and ritual,

    That is so depressing to read. If people think I'm trying to restrict mysticism to professional
    christianity then I've really been confusing the issue.

    I'll stick to the bus-driving analogy. Bus driving can be done well or badly, and when it is done
    with a complete transparency to Quality then that's what I think is mystical and it doesn't need a
    high priest of the omnibus to authenticate the process (although a teacher can tell you if you tend
    to brake too hard and cause the passengers to be jolted on a regular basis; if you're already paying
    attention to that yourself, you're most of the way there).

    All I believe is that if you want to walk down the path of Christian faith, also known as the
    Christian mystical path, then it's not a bad idea to pay attention to those who have walked the path
    before. Doesn't make it the only path, doesn't mean it's the best path available, just means that it
    is A path and there is some information that might be helpful if you want to walk it. How that
    becomes a hierarchy of power and ritual is historically clear, but I'm really not wanting to defend
    the Inquisition.

    Honestly.

    Sam

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 19 2004 - 14:12:32 GMT