Re: MD Pirsig an artist - MoQ & love

From: John Howard (john66@attbi.com)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 03:46:26 GMT

  • Next message: Ed Eads & Chris Kramer: "Re: MD Lila's Child"

    Scott,

    Good point, I was trying not to capitalize Love because it it made it
    obviously religious, like "God is Love" (God being another capitalized word
    you allude to?) and I was trying to keep God out of it for the time being at
    least.

    Thanks for addressing my question of what drives things. Does Pirsig just
    say Quality drives itself? If so, I think he is just avoiding the question,
    or refusing to divide up Quality into a Trinity of Static Quality
    (Son/Christ/Created Existence) Dynamic Quality (Holy Ghost) and the Quality
    that drives things (Father/God/Love). He names the Quality Duo of Static
    and Dynamic Quality, does he ever name the power that he just calls Quality
    that is the force that drives things?

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Scott R" <jse885@spinn.net>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:07 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Pirsig an artist - MoQ & love

    > John, Matt,
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Matthew Stone"
    > Jphn said:> > Yeah, anything doing what is expected is loving.
    > > > Water turning to steam
    > > > when it is boiled is loving, a very faithful and
    > > > unwaveringly strong love.
    > > > If we expect a rock to fall on our foot, it is love
    > > > that carries out our
    > > > expectaion and actually makes the rock fall on your
    > > > foot. (It's not
    > > > "gravity", or "electromagnetism" - it is love)
    > >
    >
    > [Matt said:]> I disagree. If love is synonymous with value, why use
    > > the term love at all?
    >
    > [I opine:] Yes, love and quality are not synonymous, but the question is
    > what drives things. There the answer can be either Love or Quality or any
    of
    > several capitalized words, with the capitalization there to remind us that
    > the Love/etc. that powers the universe is something other than lower-case
    > love/etc., but related enough that it makes some sense to use the word. It
    > is our inability to know this ultimate driver of things that requires us
    to
    > use different capitalized words at different times, since no one of them
    > suffices by itself.
    >
    > - Scott
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 28 2003 - 03:44:07 GMT