Re: MD Is the MoQ still in the Kantosphere?

From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Mon Jan 03 2005 - 11:04:40 GMT

  • Next message: Ian Glendinning: "Re: MD Re: Is Morality relative?"

    I told you you had asense of humour DMB :-)LoL
    Ian

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Buchanan" <DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 10:18 PM
    Subject: RE: MD Is the MoQ still in the Kantosphere?

    > Marsha and all campers:
    >
    > Marsha asked dmb:
    > Have you ever participated in a Nature celebration? Have you ever
    visually
    > experienced the moon's cycle? Have you ever danced gratitude for an
    > abundant harvest? Maybe you've been at a Civil War re-enactment, but have
    > you ever experienced a ritual descent of Innanna? Can you appreciate the
    > returning Sun at Yule that marks the point in the year where the days
    again
    > start to lengthen? Have you ever sung chants to Mother Earth? Have you
    > ever been in a forest grove dancing in communion with others to the
    dynamic
    > energy of fire. Have you experienced you heart beating through drums with
    > the Earth's heartbeat? No? Pity.
    >
    > dmb answers:
    > Yea, actually, I've done most of that stuff. In certain bohemian circles
    > people know me as the most loyal member of an annual summer solstice
    > gathering in the mountains of Colorado. There I am known as the honorary
    > co-host, master of ceremonies and the self-appointed shaman of the tribe.
    > This summer will be the 13th or 14th such gathering and I haven't missed
    one
    > yet.
    >
    > The winter solstice celebration that my wife and I attended this year was
    > the 29th gathering, although we've only been to a few of those.
    >
    > Once, a fireside chorus of drummers made me disappear at a Rainbow
    > gathering. These guys could drum, that's for sure. But in the light of
    day,
    > the vast majority of these so-called hippies were downright scary. I've
    > never seen such a concentration of dysfunctional, dirty, addicted people
    in
    > my life. But maybe that because I've never been to a civil war reenactment
    > or a ufology convention. ;-)
    >
    > Once, I found a blood-red stone hand axe in the woods, just before dawn,
    > while I was tripping. I stood in the rain and marveled at it for hours. It
    > may have been many thousands of years old, but I swear I could smell the
    > meat it cut within my own body. I felt bad about the death of the animal.
    I
    > was the gut that abnsorbed its meat and was the sacrificed animal too. So,
    > I'm gland that Dionysis is a friend of mine, but I think being buddies
    with
    > the Buddha and the Christ is even better, so to speak.
    >
    > I've been meaning to raise and explore the issue of patriarchal religion
    and
    > culture with you, and I'd still like to do that. Maybe start a new thread
    > here. Until then, let me just point out the solstice is meaningful to
    > neo-lithic pagans and Christians alike. And we can even talk about that
    same
    > thing in terms of philsophical mysticism. The Sol Stice is also symbolic
    of
    > timelessness and eternity as I explained to Chin earlier today in this
    > thread. The sol-stice is the time when the sun appears to stop moving. It
    > seems to rise and set at the same point on the horizon for two or three
    days
    > around the solstice and so it becomes, in religions and mythologies, a
    > metaphor for timelessness and eternity.
    >
    > And if I can guess about the ritual descent of Innanna, which I never
    heard
    > of, this too would have counterparts in more developed religions like
    > Christianity. Even if that ritual is unrelated, I can tell you that there
    is
    > a part of the Christian myth and ritual involving increasing levels of
    > darkness as candles are blown out that has appeared in some form or
    another
    > in various religions that go all the way back to the caves. When exploring
    > this line a few years back I read in an encyclopedia that "some elements
    of
    > this myth may even pre-date the human species itself". I realize that such
    a
    > statement only raises questions, but the point is simply that some
    religions
    > are more highly developed than others and that we shouldn't throw the baby
    > out with the bathwater there either. And it seems that the baby is those
    > things that persist through time and and appear in the various stages of
    > cultural development while the bathwater is the stuff that comes and goes
    as
    > a particular local expression or otherwise demonstates its obsolesence.
    >
    > The kind of ritual cannibalism we see in the Catholic church, for example,
    > might not evoke the unitive experience it symbolizes, but it sure beats
    the
    > heck out of actual human sacrifice or animal sacrifice, which was fairly
    > widely practiced in pre-historic times. Campbell spent some time talking
    > about the kind of relationship primitive peoples have with the animals
    they
    > hunt and on a very basic level it is sort of an undeniable fact that
    living
    > means killing. Meat is murder and so is salad. If one wishes to go on
    > living, one must eat and that means something else has to be eaten. And so
    > life is a very bloody affair. We grocery shoppers can hide from this to a
    > certain extent, but hunter/gatherers could not. And so the animals
    > themselves become the objects of religious practice and this is why we see
    > those painting on the cave walls. That's why we see such a proliferation
    of
    > mythological figures that are part human and part animal. And then when we
    > think of the Christ as a sacrificial lamb and the act of symbolically
    > ingesting the body and the blood, we see that we are dealing with
    something
    > very old and constant in the human experience.
    >
    > And that's probably why I tripped so hard on that pre-historic hand axe
    made
    > of blood-red stone. I had eaten lamb the night before and so the find
    struck
    > me as a deliberately placed omen, as if the gods were trying to make me
    see
    > the truth by making me literally trip over it.
    >
    > That was about ten years ago, but it seems like this morning.
    >
    > I fed my boy his first lamb chop this christmas eve. He's only four years
    > old so we did not thank god for the meal. We thanked the lamb.
    >
    > Now I forget what my point was and I need some lunch to break my fast.
    >
    > OK, now (20 minutes later) that I've eaten the sacrifical macaroni and
    > cheese I can nearly think straight. Nearly. Anyway, I wanted to point out
    > that the same theme is expressed in terms of a female deity. Campbell has
    > lots to say on the topic, as you probably know already. As he tells it,
    the
    > distinction between creator and creature, between god and man if you will,
    > does not quite appear so sharply drawn in the goddess mythologies. If we
    > think of God as a mother instead of a father, then creation unfolds within
    > her womb. God pictured as the father, by contrast, sets up an ontological
    > distinction where the creator's generative power is cast out into creation
    > by a remote figure. In the East, the myths about the sacrifice that makes
    > life possible is contained within the creation myth because it concieved
    in
    > female terms. Here the idea is that the mother Goddess is dismembered,
    > chopped up into bits in order to make the universe, not to redeem it. She
    > sacrifices her self and becomes the world by dividing herself up into
    > "things". And here we see a much better metaphor for the position taken by
    > philosophical mysticism. She is undivided. She is DQ. In allowing herself
    to
    > be divided, she creates the world of static patterns, of time and space
    and
    > things. Here, the sacrifice and the creation are not two different things.
    >
    > We can read this in Christian mythology too, but it requires us to imagine
    > that the tree that grew the death-bringing forbidden fruit in the garden
    of
    > Eden and the crucifix where the Christ gave up his life are made of the
    same
    > wood. But macaroni and cheese has only so much magic in it and this is too
    > long already.
    >
    > But if you're interested,...
    >
    > dmb
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 03 2005 - 11:08:24 GMT