Re: MD Is the MoQ still in the Kantosphere?

From: Phaedrus Wolff (PhaedrusWolff@carolina.rr.com)
Date: Mon Jan 03 2005 - 14:32:04 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "RE: MD The MOQ and Mysticism 101"

    dmb)But c'mon Chin, does focusing on a child's homework, or
    anything else, really have anything to do with direct experience of the
    undifferentiated aesthetic continuum? No, of course it doesn't.
    No-thing-ness has no things on which to focus nor any one to do the
    focusing.

    Hi dmb,

    I say focusing on a child's homework (mine are out of school now; it was
    just an example) has everything to do with undifferentiated aesthetic
    continuum. The whole idea, the events, the experiences, the people, the
    rocks are temporary, and a part of the change that is constantly going on
    around us. The chair you sit on is energized with millions of electrons that
    are in a constant dance with the universe. The mere lifting of a pencil,
    turning of a page in a book, a glance from your child is an event, a part of
    this dance of the particles and waves of the universe.

    I had written much more than this, but I'll save you my mindless rambling.
    The idea is the world is in a constant state of change, and the only way to
    appreciate it is in the moment; one child, one flower at a time.

    I can't help what you read into what I say, and I doubt if I made myself any
    clearer, but it has nothing to do with the task; everything to do with the
    moment. Poof! It's gone. Sorry you missed that one. :o)

    Chin

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Buchanan" <DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 8:30 PM
    Subject: RE: MD Is the MoQ still in the Kantosphere?

    > Chin said to dmb:
    > I think I may have thrown you off with the words " . . . where your total
    > focus is on the moment." By moment, I don't mean a point in time, but a
    > moment in focus. snip...Yes, it does mean become fully aware of the
    > 'objects' that are in front of you, and it doesn't involve asking "Are
    these
    > objects real?" It simply means 'focus'. snip...There are Zen teachings
    that
    > involve spending years meditating, but there are also those that claim you
    > can open up to a mystic experience while washing your bowl....snip
    >
    > dmb replies:
    > Thrown off? I don't think so. I think we just disagree on the matter. As I
    > understand it, lots of people understand Zen in this Americanized "chop
    > wood, carry water" way and I never thought much of it. Its too Hallmarky
    and
    > sentimental. I believe it's based on the same misconceptions I've been
    > getting at all weekend in this thread. No matter how you try to parse it,
    > Chin, you are still talking about the realities of the divided world,
    about
    > things and events in the field of time and space. Again, this is exactly
    > what I'm NOT talking about.
    >
    > I think you're really just romanticizing a common sense idea: that people
    > should pay attention to their lives and not be distracted. Its a fine
    idea.
    > In my experience, most people are sort of numb and oblivious. I even wept
    > about it once. But c'mon Chin, does focusing on a child's homework, or
    > anything else, really have anything to do with direct experience of the
    > undifferentiated aesthetic continuum? No, of course it doesn't.
    > No-thing-ness has no things on which to focus nor any one to do the
    > focusing.
    >
    > Or are you telling me that your daughter is gifted, goes to a special
    school
    > and her assignment that evening was to achieve Satori with her dad? No?
    Well
    > then please, gimme a break here ok? Sam may be on the verge of a
    > breakthrough that is years in the making and you are most definately NOT
    > helping.
    >
    > Like to fly-fishing with you sometime, but right now you're just bummin me
    > out.
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 03 2005 - 14:53:03 GMT