RE: MD The MOQ and Mysticism 101

From: MarshaV (marshalz@i-2000.com)
Date: Tue Jan 04 2005 - 22:53:48 GMT

  • Next message: Phaedrus Wolff: "Re: MD Is the MoQ still in the Kantosphere?"

    Ian and Paul,

    The way I heard it was that things (like tables) are just extremely slow
    processes. So slow that we don't notice the changes, but we experience
    what seems like a solid object to our senses. But regardless, since
    everything is changing, what is a thing or object if not a Static Quality
    process? Am I getting things and objects mixed up, or are they the same?

    Marsha

    At 03:34 PM 1/4/2005 +0000, you wrote:
    >Hi Ian
    >
    >Paul asks
    >"Are there non-SOMist things-in-themselves? What could they possibly
    >be?"
    >
    >Marsha answered that already - "Processes"
    >
    >Paul:
    >Processes aren't things though are they? You'll say semantics but what's
    >the point of philosophy if we happily dismiss confusion of our basic
    >terms as 'semantics'?

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 04 2005 - 23:09:05 GMT