From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jan 06 2005 - 14:43:43 GMT
Hi MSH,
> msh says:
> But, you see, the polarization and demise of the debate occurs when
> one party takes a contrary position but does not defend the position
> with fact and argument. If I say "I believe Z because of W, X, and
> Y, and here's why evidence in support of W, X, Y." and you say "No, Z is
> false because not-W, not-X, not-Y" this is contradiction without argument.
> This is my friend Platt's method of discussion, at least when it comes to
> politics. (Although I've noticed others getting annoyed by it in
> discussions of philosophy and science as well.) This kills debate, and
> truly does turn it into a meaningless word game.
I had to laugh at your criticism based on a complete absence of facts to
support your argument, contradicting your own one-right-way to debate.
Oops. Pointing out this lapse of logic makes me a "smart ass" in the
opinion of some. So to forestall any complaint, permit me to apologize in
advance for invoking logic on a site devoted to intellectual level
discussion. :-)
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 06 2005 - 15:25:04 GMT