Re: MD Universal Moral Standards

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Jan 08 2005 - 21:11:37 GMT

  • Next message: Phaedrus Wolff: "Re: MD Intuition"

    Hi Scott,

    Just so I understand your view of mystic experience a bit better, would
    you say the following passage from Lila is descriptive of such an
    experience?

    "He found an example within the field of music. He said, imagine that you
    walk down a street past, say, a car where someone has the radio on and it
    plays a tune you've never heard before but which is so fantastically good
    it just stops you in your tracks. You listen until it's done. Days later
    you remember exactly what that street looked like when you heard that
    music. You remember what was in the store window you stood in front of.
    You remember what the colors of the cars in the street were, where the
    clouds were in the sky above the buildings across the street, and it all
    comes back so vividly you wonder what song they were playing, and so you
    wait until you hear it again. . . . The first good, that made you want to
    buy the record, was Dynamic Quality. Dynamic Quality comes as a sort of
    surprise. What the record did was weaken for a moment your existing static
    patterns in such a way that the Dynamic Quality all around you shone
    through. It was free, without static forms." (Lila, 9)

    From what you said below, I take it this is NOT descriptive of mystic
    experience.

    > From all this, I hope you see why I don't find much value in Pirsig's view
    > of mysticism, for two reasons. One, he makes too much of "pure experience",
    > i.e., of experiencing DQ by removing all static patterns. Many mystics
    > report something like this, but as the Wilber quote shows, that isn't the
    > goal. One might say that the goal is to experience SQ without attachment to
    > any particular SQ. The second reason is that Pirsig denigrates intellect
    > with respect to DQ. Given what Merrell-Wolff and Plotinus say, I think it
    > better to treat intellect as DQ/SQ, but it needs to be purified, i.e, fully
    > detached. But intellect is the tool by which one purifies one's intellect
    > -- meditation is concentrated practice of this.
     
    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 08 2005 - 21:12:44 GMT