From: MarshaV (marshalz@charter.net)
Date: Fri Jan 14 2005 - 14:24:31 GMT
Then is God just what any Christian defines it to be?
At 07:38 AM 1/14/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Marsha)How would the majority of Christians define God? And what would
>most likely be the origin of that definition?
>
>Chin)The point is that God is just as believable to the Christian as Quality
>is to us; not that God is more believable to us.
>
>It has been my experience the Christian will split God up into the Father,
>Son, and Holy Spirit, and it seems there is a play away from the Holy Spirit
>in some religions, but I can't say as I haven't been to a church since
>childhood.
>
>It would seem to me that if you didn't split the three, but recognized as I
>have found through discussions with Christians to be true now (I don't
>believe it was taught that way when I was a child) that Quality and God can
>be interchangeable and that the MOQ might make sense to the Christian.
>
>It is in the interpretations of the Bible that would cause the difficulty
>for the Christian sceptic, and these interpretations can be looked at in a
>new light that may work with the MOQ.
>
>My main point is to not exclude any group of people for their cultural
>beliefs. Otherwise, you would be pretty ,much be excluding the majority of
>people.
>
>Grown people are still much like children. If you meet them with anger and
>resentment, they will return the favor.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 14 2005 - 14:29:55 GMT