From: Chuck Roghair (ctr@pacificpartssales.com)
Date: Fri Jan 28 2005 - 17:49:02 GMT
liberal media?
Third columnist caught with hand in the Bush till
Michael McManus, conservative author of the syndicated column "Ethics &
Religion," received $10,000 to promote a marriage initiative.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Eric Boehlert
Jan. 27, 2005 | And three makes a trend.
One day after President Bush ordered his Cabinet secretaries to stop
hiring commentators to help promote administration initiatives, and one
day after the second high-profile conservative pundit was found to be
on the federal payroll, a third embarrassing hire has emerged. Salon
has confirmed that Michael McManus, a marriage advocate whose
syndicated column, "Ethics & Religion," appears in 50 newspapers, was
hired as a subcontractor by the Department of Health and Human Services
to foster a Bush-approved marriage initiative. McManus championed the
plan in his columns without disclosing to readers he was being paid to
help it succeed.
Responding to the latest revelation, Dr. Wade Horn, assistant secretary
for children and families at HHS, announced Thursday that HHS would
institute a new policy that forbids the agency from hiring any outside
expert or consultant who has any working affiliation with the media. "I
needed to draw this bright line," Horn tells Salon. "The policy is
being implemented and we're moving forward."
Horn's move came on the heels of Wednesday's report in the Washington
Post that HHS had paid syndicated columnist and marriage advocate
Maggie Gallagher $21,000 to write brochures and essays and to brief
government employees on the president's marriage initiative. Gallagher
later wrote in her column that she would have revealed the $21,000
payment to readers had she recalled receiving it.
The Gallagher revelation came just three weeks after USA Today
reported that the Education Department, through a contract with the
Ketchum public relations firm, paid $240,000 to Armstrong Williams, a
conservative African-American print, radio and television pundit, to
help promote Bush's No Child Left Behind program to minority audiences.
To date, the Bush administration has paid public relation firms $250
million to help push proposals, according to a report Thursday in USA
Today. That's double what the Clinton administration spent on P.R. from
1997 to 2000. Shortly after Williams' contract came to light, the
Democrats on the Committee on Government Reform wrote a letter to
President Bush demanding that he "immediately provide to us all past
and ongoing efforts to engage in covert propaganda, whether through
contracts with commentators, the distribution of video news releases,
or other means." As of Thursday, a staffer on the committee told Salon,
there had been no response.
Horn says McManus, who could not be reached for comment, was paid
approximately $10,000 for his work as a subcontractor to the Lewin
Group, a health care consultancy hired by HHS to implement the
Community Healthy Marriage Initiative, which encourages communities to
combat divorce through education and counseling. McManus provided
training during two-day conferences in Chattanooga, Tenn., and also
made presentations at HHS-sponsored conferences. His syndicated column
has appeared in such papers as the Washington Times, the Dallas Morning
News and the Charlotte Observer.
Horn, who has known McManus for years, says he first learned about the
payment on Thursday. In the wake of the Gallagher story, he asked his
staff to review all outside contracts and determine if there were any
other columnists being paid by HHS. They informed him about McManus.
Horn says the review for similar contracts continues.
Horn insists that HHS was not paying Gallagher and McManus to write
about Bush administration initiatives but for their expertise as
marriage advocates. "We live in a complicated world and people wear
many different hats," he says. "People who have expertise might also be
writing columns. The line has become increasingly blurred between who's
a member of the media and who is not. Thirty years ago if you were a
columnist, then you were a full-time employee of a newspaper.
Columnists today are different."
The problem springs from the failure of both Gallagher and McManus to
disclose their government payments when writing about the Bush
proposals. But one HHS critic says another dynamic has led to the
controversy, and a blurring of ethical and journalistic lines: Horn and
HHS are hiring advocates -- not scholars -- from the pro-marriage
movement. "They're ideological sympathizers who propagandize," says Tim
Casey, attorney for Legal Momentum, a women's rights organization. He
describes McManus as being a member of the "extreme religious right."
Horn denies the charge: "It's not true that we have just been
selectively working with conservatives." According to news accounts,
the administration seeks to spend $1.5 billion promoting marriage
through marriage-enrichment courses, counseling and public-awareness
campaigns.
In 1996, McManus co-founded Marriage Savers, a conservative advocacy
group, which, among other things, urges clergy not to conduct a
marriage ceremony unless the couple has had lengthy counseling first.
"The church should not be a 'wedding factory,' but a training ground
for strong marriages to go the distance -- for life," McManus wrote.
In his April 3, 2004, column, McManus wrote, "The Healthy Marriage
Initiative would provide funds to help those couples improve their
skills of conflict resolution so they might actually marry -- and be
equipped to build a healthy marriage. Those skills can be taught by
mentor couples in churches for free. But for the non-religious,
counselors would be paid."
A year earlier, McManus assured readers that funds provided for the
Healthy Marriage Initiative "could be used to teach skills to improve
communication and resolve conflict that would make the relationship
happier and lead to a healthy marriage." He based that assessment on
comments made by HHS's Horn, who, indirectly, served as McManus' boss
-- although that relationship was never revealed to readers.
On Jan 28, 2005, at 1:23 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
> Poot,
> Agreed, see my response to Arlo.
> Ian
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt poot" <mattpoot@hotmail.com>
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 2:14 AM
> Subject: Re: MD Quality and Bias In Commercial Media
>
>
>>
>> I think a major block against making any headway in this discussion,
>> is the use of quotes and out-sources as proof of verification.
>> Whether it is quoting pirsig, the MRC, a newspaper, or whatever, it
>> basically serves no point.
>>
>>
>> How about a discussion composed entirely of every individuals own
>> thoughts, un-complicated/misconstrued by quotes. I Think we could
>> all benefit from such discussion, and otherwise will continue in to
>> talk circles around each other.
>>
>>
>> POOT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
>> Mail Archives:
>> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
>> Nov '02 Onward -
>> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
>> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>>
>> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
>> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 28 2005 - 20:35:21 GMT