Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

From: Scott Roberts (jse885@localnet.com)
Date: Mon Jan 31 2005 - 03:13:43 GMT

  • Next message: Ron Winchester: "MD Capitalism -vs- the Noble savage"

    DMB et al,

    > dmb says:
    > Pirsig's mysticism is descended from Plato and Plotinus, from the East,
    from
    > Native American mysticism, but not from the Modern Romantics.

    Since Plato and Plotinus felt that the "way" was through the intellect to
    Intellect, while the Romantics (and James) tended to disparage the
    intellect, as Pirsig does (with respect to spiritual advancement), I wonder
    how you can claim this.

    [DMB from another post in this thread]
    > But if the mystical experience is included
    > as verifiable, empirical evidence, then we are most certainly expanding
    the
    > notion of empiricism. I've tried to explain this several times already

    The point is that Matt and I don't buy this expansion. It is certainly the
    business of a philosopher to shift the meanings of key words, but then the
    marketplace (other thinkers' reactions) has to accept it. I don't buy it for
    two reasons. The first is that it makes the old meaning of empiricism lose
    value. With the old meaning, if I claim something, and someone else says "I
    don't believe you", then I can say, "well, go look (or perform this
    experiment)". With mystical experience, the "go look" becomes "go join a
    monastery, sit in meditation for a few years, and maybe (there are no
    guarantees), you will see for yourself". The difference is too big to be
    covered by one word.

    The second reason is, what if I forget to specify that they join a Zen
    monastery, but instead join a Christian one, and they come back and say "You
    were wrong, I didn't experience "no-thing-ness", I experienced Christ within
    me.". That is, the variety and interpretation of mystical experience is very
    wide. Is it empirically evident that we can speak to the spirits of the
    dead, since Swedenborg (a mystic that Pirsig mentions) did? Why is only
    "pure, undifferentiated experience" regarded as empirical and not life after
    death, reincarnation, channeling, ESP, Heaven and Hell (Swedenborg says his
    conversations happened in Heaven)? All this and more is reported by mystics,
    with the claim that anyone can have these experiences.

    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 31 2005 - 03:16:37 GMT