From: Ron Winchester (phaedruswolff@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2005 - 03:20:31 GMT
LOL
damned if you don't define something damned if you do
(or should I say confuse)
Erin
Hi Erin,
I'm glad you aprreciated what I was doing here. If you can expand the
meaning of metaphysics, then I see no reason why you could not also expand
the meaning of empirical to better reflect modern metaphysical views.
Ron
>From: Erin <macavity11@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic
>Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:04:44 -0800 (PST)
>
>LOL
>damned if you don't define something damned if you do
>(or should I say confuse)
>
>Erin
>
>Ron Winchester <phaedruswolff@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Scott:
>I like this a lot. I think there is one additional distinction to make,
>though, within the category "metaphysics". One might call it "finalizing"
>or
>"asymptotic" metaphysics versus (as Whitehead describes his) "speculative"
>metaphysics.
>
>Hi Scott,
>
>I don't like your use of the word metaphysics here. If we look at
>metaphysics through all these meanings, does it not tend to confuse?
>
>Ron
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 14 2005 - 18:06:05 GMT