Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Fri Feb 18 2005 - 09:47:06 GMT

  • Next message: Ian Glendinning: "Re: MD ID/Ling, again"

    Ron,
    Absolutely !
    Ian
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ron Winchester" <phaedruswolff@hotmail.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 8:03 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

    > Ian: IMHO the "aether" is due for a comeback.
    > (ie with minimal tweaking, adjusted for relativity, it's not a bad
    > metaphor
    > for that quantum soup, or chaotic void, whatever.)
    >
    > Ron: . . or Quality, or Nothingness, or glue (Glucon Plasma)?
    >
    > A word is a word is a word. Huh?
    >
    >
    >>From: "Ian Glendinning" <ian@psybertron.org>
    >>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >>Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic
    >>Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:08:08 -0000
    >>
    >>Ron,
    >>
    >>IMHO the "aether" is due for a comeback.
    >>(ie with minimal tweaking, adjusted for relativity, it's not a bad
    >>metaphor for that quantum soup, or chaotic void, whatever.)
    >>
    >>Ian
    >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Winchester"
    >><phaedruswolff@hotmail.com>
    >>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >>Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:16 AM
    >>Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic
    >>
    >>
    >>>Ron shows his ignorance;
    >>>"The nothingness that we don't understand was proven by Quantum Physics"
    >>>
    >>>Scott;
    >>>While I think your use of the word "proven" is a gross overstatement, I
    >>>think there is some relation with mystical talk on nothingness and
    >>>quantum
    >>>physics, but I'd like you to expand on how you see it.
    >>>
    >>>Hi Scott,
    >>>
    >>>The word 'Proven' is a gross overstatement, and should be excluded from
    >>>philosophical language. :o)
    >>>
    >>>That was a slip on my part. I should never have said proven.
    >>>
    >>>As I see it, the nothingness of non-deity Zen is the same as the void,
    >>>nothingness, or 'Quantum Soup.' It is all theory, and as like every
    >>>theory we have had prior, such as Aether have been 'Reconsidered' (as
    >>>opposed to disproven:)
    >>>
    >>>The only compliment of Quantum Physics to Nothingness of Zen is that both
    >>>Quantum Physics and Zen have realized that they do not 'Know' what this
    >>>nothingness consists of. Any knowledge we have is temporary. All we think
    >>>we know is that everything came from this Nothingness for lack of a word
    >>>because it cannot be described.
    >>>
    >>>Let's just say that Quantum Physics leads us to think a bit closer toward
    >>>Eastern philosophy, or what can be termed as spirituality.
    >>>
    >>>On empirical and SOM, and the MOQ being stuck on SOM in its use of the
    >>>word empirical, is that I see you accepting, or being confused that a
    >>>Mystic Experience is something other than enlightenment as to how the
    >>>world is, that does not come from some 'Out There' field or force.
    >>>
    >>>The difference between enlightenment and the Christian Mystical
    >>>Experience is that you know prior to the experience what you are going to
    >>>experience when you are looking for the Virgin Mary. An Enlightened
    >>>Mystical Experience is something that comes to you from what I would call
    >>>'Within.'
    >>>
    >>>I have been warned about using the term intuition, but I am thinking we
    >>>already have within us the knowledge, but just do not see it as we are
    >>>preconditioned to a belief system that was built into us from childhood
    >>>on. The mystical experience in Eastern spirituality comes from separating
    >>>ourselves from our prejudices as to what we "Think we know.' Quantum
    >>>Physics lend to this in the 'Knower and the Known' that you mentioned
    >>>before are the same. Eastern spirituality does not tell us what to look
    >>>for in a mystical experience. Quantum Soup is simply an extenstion to the
    >>>idea that this nothingness can not be known; it has no characteristics
    >>>that we can understand.
    >>>
    >>>('Quantum Soup' is just slang thrown at the physicists for their lack of
    >>>ability to accept something that cannot be proven)
    >>>
    >>>Thinking of Quantum Soup brings me to some thoughts about 'Emprical
    >>>Data.' It seems to me that in most fields, the use of the term 'Empirical
    >>>Data' is more of an insult thrown toward the Empiricists, or those who
    >>>depend too much on what is considered emprical data.
    >>>
    >>>Ron
    >>>
    >>>>From: "Scott Roberts" <jse885@localnet.com>
    >>>>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >>>>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >>>>Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic
    >>>>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:21:47 -0700
    >>>>
    >>>>Ron,
    >>>>
    >>>>Ron said: This is where I see the difficulty Scott is having with
    >>>>empiricism.
    >>>>
    >>>>Scott:
    >>>>You see wrong. Like DMB, you take what I say and then add humongous
    >>>>assumptions to what I say and argue on the basis of those erroneous
    >>>>assumptions. I then have to spend a ridiculous amount saying "that's not
    >>>>what I said". Somehow, you have interpreted my objecting to Pirsig's
    >>>>expansion of the word 'empiricism' to the belief that I think that
    >>>>changing
    >>>>the usage of all words is a bad thing. In my first post about this
    >>>>subject I
    >>>>explicitly denied that.
    >>>>
    >>>>You have some notion of what I think about mystical events, but I'm not
    >>>>even
    >>>>sure what it is. Do you think that I think that all mystical events are
    >>>>equally valid or invalid? That a vision of the Virgin Mary should be
    >>>>treated
    >>>>the same as Zen satori? I do not.
    >>>>
    >>>>You seem to think that I am stuck in SOM prejudices. I think the MOQ is
    >>>>stuck in SOM prejudices, for example, in calling itself "empirical". If
    >>>>we
    >>>>are going to debate this you have got to resist your tendency to go off
    >>>>on
    >>>>big rambles based on wrong assumptions about what I think. If you're not
    >>>>sure what I think, then ask, and I will clarify as well as I can.
    >>>>
    >>>>Meanwhile, I am curious about this sentence:
    >>>>
    >>>>"The nothingness that we don't understand was proven by Quantum Physics"
    >>>>
    >>>>While I think your use of the word "proven" is a gross overstatement, I
    >>>>think there is some relation with mystical talk on nothingness and
    >>>>quantum
    >>>>physics, but I'd like you to expand on how you see it.
    >>>>
    >>>>- Scott
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >>>>Mail Archives:
    >>>>Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >>>>Nov '02 Onward -
    >>>>http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >>>>MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >>>>
    >>>>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >>>>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>_________________________________________________________________
    >>>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
    >>>FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >>>Mail Archives:
    >>>Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >>>Nov '02 Onward -
    >>>http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >>>MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >>>
    >>>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >>>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >>Mail Archives:
    >>Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >>Nov '02 Onward -
    >>http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >>MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >>
    >>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >>
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
    > get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 18 2005 - 10:35:33 GMT