RE: MD Quality and Bias In Commercial Media

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Mon Feb 21 2005 - 01:48:45 GMT

  • Next message: Ant McWatt: "MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"

    Mark Heyman:

    Tell us why Chomsky would support Ward Churchill?

    Tell us why a fake reporter with an assumed name is allowed into the White
    House. The fact that he is also a gay prostitute is not relevant to my
    concerns, but it sure is funny - especially since he wrote gay-bashing
    articles with headlines like, "John Kerry could be our First Gay President".
    (I suppose Gannon/Guckert is Carl Rove's love monkey or something.) And how
    is it that the paid shills like Armstrong Williams can blend in with the
    other "normal" reporters? Why does it take the exposure of financial
    documents? Why can't we notice that these people are servile whores just
    based on what they're saying? I mean, has the distinction between fact and
    opinion become so blurred that no one can tell a journalist from a
    propagandist anymore? And where is the story that puts all these isolated
    scandals into context. It doesn't take a genius to see that a pattern is
    emerging here. The old saying is probably true: Nobody ever went broke
    underestimating the intelligence of the American people. But its really
    starting to freak me out.

    These are some juicy times for media and power. I'd like to know what you
    think.

    dmb

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 21 2005 - 02:42:50 GMT