From: Ant McWatt (antmcwatt@hotmail.co.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 21 2005 - 01:22:25 GMT
Erin,
Well spotted in noticing that typographical error.
Yes, statement 4) should read:
"...the fundamental tenet of the MOQ i.e. that (ontologically) values come
before subjects and objects, not simultaneously with them and certainly not
AFTER them."
Is that all the clarification you were looking for with these statements or
is there something else?
Best wishes,
Anthony.
Erin stated February 20th:
>I am having a trouble reconciling the first couple of your statements with
>the next couple of >statements, could you clarify please.
>
>1)"an apple falls irrespective of the theories concerning why and how
>these events happen."
>
>2)Was there consciousness before the biological level came into being? No.
>
>with
>
>3)"To deny that values are self-contained is to re-introduce SOM via having
>a
>“senser” and “something sensed”."
>
>4) and assuming that "certainly not before them" was just a typo
>" the fundamental tenet of the MOQ i.e. that (ontologically) values
>come before subjects and objects, not simultaneously with them and
>certainly
>not before them."
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 21 2005 - 02:12:21 GMT