Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

From: MarshaV (marshalz@charter.net)
Date: Sun Feb 27 2005 - 02:03:19 GMT

  • Next message: Erin: "RE: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"

    At 11:19 AM 2/7/2005 -0700, you wrote:

    Scott:
    Intellect, Consciousness, and Quality are all names for the same (non-)thing.
    All SQ is semiotic, that is, communication and expression.
    Time and space are not fundamental, but are produced by consciousness.
    Form is formlessness, formlessness is form (or SQ is DQ, DQ is SQ). This cannot be stated "clearly", however, as it is a case of contradictory identity.
    The self is a locus of DQ/SQ interaction.

    Scott,

    I think I'm beginning to understand that you are looking at this from the point of view of the self.  When interacting with Dynamic quality and Static quality, a self may be affected in a number of ways.  A person (self) may be conscious (use senses), they may think (use intellect), they may act (use will).   Your theory's point-of-view is the human experience?.  'What happens to me when I experience DQ and SQ?'  

    Am I kinda getting it, or way off base?

    Marsha


    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archives: Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 27 2005 - 03:08:13 GMT