MD Supporting the Statement

From: Horse (horse@darkstar.uk.net)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 02:20:42 GMT

  • Next message: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "RE: MD Gardner on Pragmatism"

    Hi Glenn

    On 5 Jan 2003 at 21:38, Horse wrote:

    > On a happier note though positivism/scientism does appear to be
    > losing much of it's appeal because for most people it has very little to say and
    > attempts to degrade many activities which most hold in high regard as meaningless.
    > Philosophy, art, music, etc.

    The request was made that I should support the above statement.

    It's fairly obvious that I was referring to Logical Positivism and the two terms are often
    used to refer to the same thing. If you don't accept this, then read the entry for Logical
    Positivism in The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy:

    logical positivism, also called positivism.....

    Whilst it may be true that some people do still follow the doctrine of Logical Positivism
    the continued mass acceptance of these ideas didn't occur and the overall concept has
    been in decline for many years. If it had been of higher value than later advances in the
    philosophy of science then it would have fared better - but it didn't. So ultimately it has
    little to say to most people.

    For a definition of degrade see:

    www.dictionary.com
    Degrade: To reduce in grade, rank, or status; demote.

    To me this just seems so obvious that little elaboration is required.

    One of the aims of Logical Positivism was to effectively put science at the top of the
    heap. This was, I believe, in response to continental philosophy and the high status of
    Metaphysics. In order to do this other non-verifiable activities were reduced in status.
    Metaphysics was effectively regarded as 'bunk', ethics reduced to emotivism and
    aesthetics to, well.... take your pick really. Overall, philosophy was seen as a means to
    analyse language. If that isn't a demotion then I don't know what is!

    Art and Music are effectively in the same class. Although they may be enjoyed by many
    they are essentially meaningless (in the technical, non-verifiable sense) and thus
    provide little knowledge about the world. As they provide little knowledge about the
    world compared to Science then they are of a lower order when it comes to the aims of
    Logical Positivism i.e. explaining the world. Again a demotion.

    So Logical Positivism is losing (in fact, has lost) much of it's appeal because it has little
    to say and does attempt to degrade (i.e. reduce in grade, rank, or status; demote) many
    activities which most hold in high regard as meaningless. Philosophy, art, music, etc.

    Horse

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 04 2003 - 02:16:53 GMT