From: Scott Roberts (jse885@localnet.com)
Date: Mon Mar 21 2005 - 00:03:24 GMT
DMB,
DMB said:
But the MOQ is empirical from head to toe. It asserts nothing without
evidence.
Scott asks:
What is the empirical evidence that there is value at the inorganic level?
(I've been asking for this for several months, from you, Paul, and Ant, and
have yet to receive an answer. If the answer is that subatomic elements
"prefer" some states over others, I would ask how do you know that that is
"preferment" and not, say, chance?)
What is the empirical evidence that, all else being equal, the more dynamic
is better than the less dynamic?
Please note that I think that there is value at the inorganic level, and
that the more dynamic is better, but I fail to see how either statement can
be justified empirically.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 21 2005 - 00:24:05 GMT