From: MarshaV (marshalz@charter.net)
Date: Sat Apr 09 2005 - 13:33:19 BST
Hi Wim,
At 07:49 AM 4/9/2005 +0200, you wrote:
... (snip to the last portion of the bottom paragraph)
> From a social level point of view their stability cannot be
>distinguished from Dynamic Quality (i.e. from their changeability).
>Intellectual quality indeed SEEMS the same as Dynamic Quality at the social
>level.
THEIR meaning Static Quality at the Intellectual Level. Is that right?
I don't understand Quantum Physics which is at the Intellectual Level, but
in no way does it resemble Dynamic Quality. I recognize it as something I
don't understand and can search for a way to understand it. It is created
by humans, Quantum Physics as theory is not threatening, overwhelming or
awesome. It is a very interesting new way of looking at existence. I'd
have to say it doesn't come close to Dynamic Quality which to me is beyond
differentiation.
Marsha
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 09 2005 - 13:36:27 BST