From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Sat Apr 09 2005 - 19:10:06 BST
Dear Marsha,
In your post of 9 Apr 8:33 -0400 you quoted me from 9 Apr 7:49 +0200:
>> From a social level point of view their stability cannot be
>> distinguished from Dynamic Quality (i.e. from their changeability).
>> Intellectual quality indeed SEEMS the same as Dynamic Quality at the
>> social level.
You reacted:
> THEIR meaning Static Quality at the Intellectual Level. Is that right?
Intellectual patterns of value, yes.
> I don't understand Quantum Physics which is at the Intellectual Level,
> but in no way does it resemble Dynamic Quality. I recognize it as
> something I don't understand and can search for a way to understand it.
> It is created by humans, Quantum Physics as theory is not threatening,
> overwhelming or awesome. It is a very interesting new way of looking
> at existence. I'd have to say it doesn't come close to Dynamic Quality
> which to me is beyond differentiation.
Right. You are not comparing Quantum Physics and Dynamic Quality from a
social level point of view, but from an intellectual level point of view.
From THAT point of view they indeed don't seem the same at all.
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 09 2005 - 19:09:09 BST