RE: MD Creativity and Philosophology, 2

From: Matt Kundert (pirsigaffliction@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 24 2005 - 03:45:46 BST

  • Next message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Access to Quality"

    DMB,

    DMB said:
    Philosophy is supposed to be about life and if your philosophy is about
    philosophy then it is not about life.

    And I see this same problem across the board. I love art, but I hate
    paintings that are ABOUT PAINTING. I hate poetry that is ABOUT POETRY. I
    hate music that is ABOUT MUSIC as well as movies ABOUT MOVIES. And this is
    what I mean by my complaints about what you post here. I get the distinct
    impression that your philosophy is ABOUT PHILOSOPHY and has very little to
    do with what's in your heart. It doesn't come from your life so much as from
    the books you've read.

    Matt:
    Are the books we read not part of our lives?

    As I quipped in my paper, "Why is the experience of a book relegated to a
    lower position than the experience of a hot dog?"

    I followed that with, "There can be no theoretical, universal reason for
    this (that would be the kind of “intellectualizing of its hosts behavior”
    that Pirsig condemns), though we can give practical, context-dependent
    reasons. For instance, in Pirsig's case it is imperative that his quest for
    inner peace cross through the history of philosophy. It is important for him
    to engage in conversation with the great, dead philosophers to achieve a
    measure of wisdom on how to deal with them. This is purity for his heart,
    not the heart of philosophy."

    So, say what you will that what I write is dead and boring and lifeless.
    But that doesn't mean its lifeless to other people, like myself, that are
    brought to life by the same things, like the reading of a book. Same thing
    goes for the art, poetry, music, and movies you don't like. Some people do
    like them because that's what's in their hearts. Those "practical,
    context-dependent reasons" are _personal_ reasons. Nobody can tell you, in
    a broad sense, whether you are doing philosophy correctly or the right way
    because philosophy is deeply personal. And that's what Pirsig's spirit
    says. And that's what I've been trying to repeat, in my own lifeless,
    substanceless way, against other people here and against a certain general
    drift in Pirsig's writings that lends comfort to those people.

    You see what I'm saying?

    Matt

    _________________________________________________________________
    On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
    get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 24 2005 - 03:50:59 BST