Re: MD Primary Reality

From: Steve & Oxsana Marquis (marquis@nccn.net)
Date: Thu Apr 28 2005 - 03:45:12 BST

  • Next message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Primary Reality"

    Ham asks:
    ___________________

    Oh, one additional question. Do you feel that a third statement would be
    required to adequately represent the major reality perspectives of the MD
    group?
    __________________

    To define primary reality in terms of static patterns seems quite dogmatic,
    kind of headed towards an absolute truth. Isn't this what Pirsig is trying
    to get us away from?

    For myself option C would be 'It depends'. It depends on what we need the
    answer for. Once we are away from an ineffable non-attributed indefinable
    all anything goes. We pick the rules depending on the game.

    Live well,
    Steve

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 28 2005 - 05:28:47 BST