Re: MD Primary Reality

From: Scott Roberts (jse885@localnet.com)
Date: Thu Apr 28 2005 - 05:46:22 BST

  • Next message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Primary Reality"

    Ham,

    Ham asked us to choose:
    Statement A.

    "Ontologically, [its] materialism means that matter, nature, the observable
    world is taken 'without reservations' as real in its own right, neither
    deriving its reality from any supernatural or transcendental source, nor
    dependent for its existence on the mind of man. It is considered
    scientifically evident that matter is prior to mind both temporally and
    logically in the sense that mind never appears except as an outgrowth of
    matter, and must be explained accordingly. Space and time are viewed as
    forms of the existence of matter." [Dagobert Runes, philosopologist]

    Statement B.

    "I believe that consciousness and its contents are all that exists. ...The
    world of our daily experience-the world of tables, chairs, stars and people,
    with their attendant shapes, smells, feels and sounds-is a species-specific
    user interface to a realm far more complex, a realm whose essential
    character is conscious. ... If this be right, if consciousness is
    fundamental, then we should not be surprised that, despite centuries of
    effort by the most brilliant minds, there is as yet no physical theory of
    consciousness, no theory that explains how mindless matter and energy or
    fields could be, or cause, conscious experience." [Donald Hoffman,
    cognitive scientist]

    Oh, one additional question. Do you feel that a third statement would be
    required to adequately represent the major reality perspectives of the MD
    group?

    Scott:
    I would just call (B) immaterialism, since Platonic idealism is not
    consciousness-centric, and other idealisms (Berkeley, Kant, Hegel, Bradley)
    all have their quirks. In any case, I've stated several times my notion of
    "primary reality": everything is semiotic. This is, I suppose, a variation
    on (B). I feel it is well expressed by Aquinas: "The object of nature is
    established between two intelligences."

    Where is the Hoffman quote from, BTW?

    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 28 2005 - 06:05:06 BST