Re: MD The New Victorians

From: khaled Alkotob (khaledsa@juno.com)
Date: Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:20:59 BST

  • Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD The New Victorians"

    I am just going to examine just one point here. I have been hearing about
    the SS issue and the reform it needs. Yes it does need changing, for one
    thing people are living longer and the way the system is set up will be
    bankrupt soon.
    I had never thought of it in a way that if you invest it right, and don't
    use all of it, your children get to inherit. Great point.
    Unfortunately, while I support the effort 100%, I am very nervous of
    having ALL my retirement in the private sector. Does Enron mean anything.
    We already hear about the bad things companies do because "they have an
    obligation tot heir share holders."
    Here in California we are still recovering from the mess we got into due
    tot he greed of the energy companies a few years ago. There are
    documented phone calls and e-mails encouraging the shut down of
    generation plants so prices can go up.
    I don't want more government oversight into private businesses. I want
    the private sector to have more Stewardship toward what the do.

    So while SS needs fixing, i question the motive. This president, who
    can't even pronounce the word "nuclear right", does not have the
    intelligence to have initiated the reform on his own. There is a motive
    somewhere behind it. Just like the medicare reform fiasco passed last
    year. Yes it needed fixing, but now we find out that it was financed by
    the drug companies.

    Reforms not to favor the citizens but the private companies that can
    benefit. This government, that wants the individuals to take
    responsibility for themselves, tend to be in support of corporate
    welfare.

    Khaled

    Plat wrote
    > Other progressive moves the New Victorians block are: a reform
    > Social
    > Security so the poor can leave assets to their children; an effort
    > shake
    > up the UN to increase its effectiveness and avoid future scandals;
    > a call
    > to permit democracy to work at the state level to determine abortion
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:27:56 BST