From: Scott Roberts (jse885@localnet.com)
Date: Tue May 03 2005 - 20:46:28 BST
Mark,
msh:
Yes, but thanks to Chomsky, we now understand that language is rooted
in biology.
Scott:
No we don't. In the first place, Chomsky's deep structure is a debated issue
(at least it was when I was studying linguistics in the 80's). In the second
place, if there is a deep structure or Universal Grammar, to say that it is
biological is merely to find the only place for it (brain hard-wiring) that
a materialist could accept. Drop the materialist assumption and it could be
elsewhere, e.g., in a Sheldrakian morphic form.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 03 2005 - 22:21:20 BST