From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Wed May 04 2005 - 00:21:18 BST
Hi Scott,
Such glee in your voice when you find something to call me on! It's
kinda flattering, really.
On 3 May 2005 at 13:46, Scott Roberts wrote:
msh:
Yes, but thanks to Chomsky, we now understand that language is rooted
in biology.
Scott:
No we don't. In the first place, Chomsky's deep structure is a debated issue
(at least it was when I was studying linguistics in the 80's). In the second
place, if there is a deep structure or Universal Grammar, to say that it is
biological is merely to find the only place for it (brain hard-wiring) that
a materialist could accept. Drop the materialist assumption and it could be
elsewhere, e.g., in a Sheldrakian morphic form.
msh:
You're right; it's still debated, something like 95-5% in favor of
deep structure. The UG model has been virtually uncontested in the
study of linguistics for 45 years; at least that's my understanding.
Anyway, l made a comment to Matt in passing, not intending to
actually move the conversation in that direction, since my technical
grasp of Linguistics would not allow me to move it very far. What
I've read of the history of linguistics seems to indicate that every
linguist on the planet recognizes Chomsky as a genius who single-
handedly stood the subject on its head.
As for Sheldrake, you could be right. I don't know enough about
morphic forms to comment. Has he addressed the issue of a Universal
Grammar? Has he published and debated his linguistic ideas? If not,
let's talk about it when his name appears dozens of times in the
indexes of every linguistic text on earth.
That'll give me plenty of time to prepare myself. :-)
BTW, I googled _sheldrake linguistics_ and came up empty. I did find
an interesting article in Science Daily, date 3/10/05, that says that
linguistic models are JUST NOW starting to drift a little away from a
strict Universal Grammar, but it doesn't mention that they are
drifting toward Sheldrake and morphic forms.
"For several decades the model for studying linguistics has included
the assumption that human brains come built with a genetically
specified 'universal grammar', and that the features of human
languages are derived from variations in how this universal grammar
mechanism can operate. No matter how complicated, or mutually
unintelligible they are, all languages still follow basic guidelines
common to all of them."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/02/050223150852.htm
Best,
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
--
InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
"Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly; Man got to sit and wonder 'why, why,
why?' Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land; Man got to tell himself he
understand." - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 04 2005 - 00:22:02 BST