Re: MD the ideology of capitalism - the Ayn Rand question

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed May 11 2005 - 15:31:36 BST

  • Next message: Arlo Bensinger: "Re: MD Primary Reality"

    Arlo,
     
    > I guess my point was that those who make use of, for example,
    > publically-funded libraries, or public roads, or even enjoy recreational
    > access to our state parks, are not "sponging off others". Society as a
    > whole benefits when more people have more access to these infrastructure
    > supports. This in turn produces "more wealth", which in turn can be applied
    > to strengthening infrastructural support.

    I like to keep in mind that "public works," with a few exceptions, are
    only made possible by productive individuals who pay taxes.

    > I don't think our disagreement on this diverges until we talk about
    > programs to help the severely disenfranchised (most of which, I do admit,
    > have failed... mostly because they have been band-aid solutions at best).
    > That is, I think the societal benefit of a public roadway system is for
    > most people self-evident, same with public libraries and museums.

    I agree. I'm not sure, however, what you mean by "severely
    disenfranchised." To me, a franchise in the political context means the
    right to vote.

    > I am only emphasizing the reciprocal relationship between these things and
    > the "wealth" any generation can produce. That is, it is easy to see them as
    > nothing more than "products", rather than support (latches) than enable
    > individuals to produce greater wealth.

    I agree, but I like to keep in mind the individuals of great wealth who
    have donated much towards creating parks, schools, libraries, museums and
    other pubic goods. (Such individuals make up "the few exceptions"
    mentioned above.)

    > Does "sponging" occur? Of course. When the government deliberately keeps
    > unemployment set at a particular level to offset inflation (for those of us
    > working), by definition those without income "sponge"? What is the
    > alternative?

    I doubt your theory that government prevents people from working to
    "offset inflation." Inflation is primarily caused by the government
    printing more money than the economy needs. As for alternatives to
    sponging, one must question why someone is "without income." Why, for
    example, do many oppressed people from Vietnam come to the U.S with little
    or nor money or education (and can't speak English) and in a short time,
    become self-supporting productive citizens?

    One of the best things about America is that it offers more opportunity
    and social mobility that any other country. The millions who want to
    emigrate here, and the millions more who have become successful here,
    testify to that.

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 11 2005 - 15:30:57 BST