From: Johannes Volmert (jvolmert@student.uni-kassel.de)
Date: Tue Jun 21 2005 - 21:16:49 BST
Hi Bo,
I do know that I owe you an answer on your new essay as it is sort of an
answer to my "compliance" back then in last years exchange (Jan '04). I
read it once, then I printed it and read it twice but I'm afraid to say
that I still can make not much more sense out of it then before. Due to
a lack of time, I have to postpone my evaluation of it. Until then
(until I have taken a concise position) of course I'm not quite
legitimated to take again a controversial stand. As to my last post:
<>
Johannes Volmert wrote:
> <>Hi Allen,
> you are, as you seem to know already, not the first one to discuss
> with Bo his ideas (SOLAQI etc.) und you sure will not be the last one.
> Some of the people who did so in the past are still around, but stay
> away from that argument, normally.
Bo answered:
>Implied .. a maniac who won't listen to reason ;-). After my
>"second coming" however I have managed to make this forum's
>heavy-weight Matt Kundert understand the MOQ by the SOL-light
>(Bei'm Sonnenschein) and that's no small feat. He has objections
>of course, but his are from the Kundert "factory" and not like
>these ever new arrivals who think I am a MOQ heretic.
>
>
JoVo says:
I don't think you consider me after all these years as a "new arrival" ,
I hope. As you seem to ackknowledge the basic tenets of the MoQ (I
suppose so!) you cannot really believe that I accept your SOL-idea, just
because Matt Kundert is vowing positivly on some points of your stand,
do you?
Matts posts are mostly a good read. He argues clearly, concisely and
leaves seldom doubt about his point of view. But altough I haven't read
all his posts (upon this issue), I have doubts that he shares your point
of view as you seem to assume.
JoVo wrote:
>>But there is no reason to get upset
>>about Bo. Don't make a personal thing out of it. As you can see, Bo
>>himself stays calm and friendly and is by the way (with at least one
>>minor exception: "Don't mention the war!" ;-)) ) a very appreciated
>>member of this discussion forum.
>>
>>
Bo answered:
>Was it the Squonk ...or?
>
>
JoVo says:
I just don't know what exactly you want to allude to here, but the
favourite issue of yours, I want to adress is just the named one
(SOLAQI, SOL or alike....).
JoVo said (to Allen):
>>Nevertheless, your arguments seem to
>>be valid and right to the point, but that isn't any help sometimes!
>>
>>
>
>
>
Bo asked in return:
>Allen's arguments valid and right to the point? Can you translate
>them for me? Seriously.
>
>
JoVo says:
I simply referred to the logical inconsistencies that I still see in the
way you argued (and Allen also adressed).
>About "no help ....etc." If Mike's (approved by Allen) about
>Phaedrus' intellectual knife and the many ways it can slice
>experience are examples of "valid and right to the point"?
>
>Thanks anyway.
>Bo
>
JoVo resumes:
I don't see any additional points to your SOL sofar, but I will have a
closer look to yor essay once again. All that I see right now is a
dogmatic battle for SOL (or SOLAQI) although there have been numerous
rejections of it. I'll be back for it soon.
Greetings to Norway, JoVo
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 21 2005 - 21:20:33 BST