Re: MD Our Immoral Supreme Court

From: Arlo Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 15:34:41 BST

  • Next message: Arlo Bensinger: "Re: MD Our Immoral Supreme Court"

    Hi Mike (All),

    I'm going to take a small point of contention here. While there are many on
    this list who, by recent posts, are interested in epistemological issues
    surrounding the MOQ, there are also those of use who are (speaking for
    myself, of course) interested also in a praxiological discussion
    (transformative practice rather than theory) relating to an adoption of MOQ
    views. Towards this end, sociological and even political issues are
    interesting.

    The point of agreement made with Platt was expressed by most who took
    exception only to the derivative analysis of the decision. That is, if I
    posted that the court's decision was immoral, according to the MOQ, and
    what led to this decision was small children who watched Barney, you'd
    likely point out that while my evaluation of the ruling was correct, the
    analysis used was quite absurd.

    No one, lest of all me, expects that Platt will ever break out of his
    dichotomous Weltanshauung, but, as MSH correctly pointed out, fundamental
    absurdities can't go unchallenged. The list is archived, after all, and
    newcomers may potential balk when they read that members of the MOQ
    supported the idea that "liberalism" was the cause of a decision allowing
    corporate entities to seize profit property to generate greater wealth for
    corporate stockholders.

    At any rate, I think the list can house epistemological and praxiological
    discussions without conflict. But, to express some agreement, all we can do
    is point out the absurdities of such posts, engaging the author (on this
    issue) is futile... we all know that.

    Arlo

    At 07:43 AM 6/30/2005, you wrote:
    >Here we go again. Personally I did feel a little bit of schadenfreude
    >towards Platt in this case. Unfortunately, as seems to be usual, a
    >smug over-reaction to his post has turned a point of agreement (the
    >immorality of the Supreme Court decision) into another meaningless
    >clogging-up of the MD with aimless sparring. Can't you see that with
    >this attitude, you'll never progress or agree on anything?
    >
    >Mike
    >
    >
    >
    >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >Mail Archives:
    >Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 30 2005 - 17:49:52 BST