Re: MD Theism, Non-Theism, Anti-Theism, Nihilism

From: MarshaV (marshalz@charter.net)
Date: Mon Jul 18 2005 - 09:00:56 BST

  • Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Personal Report on MoQ Conference"

    At 05:41 PM 7/17/2005 +0200, Bo wrote:
    >Finally, Pirsig is correct: the MOQ is anti-theist, no need to waver
    >on that point. Intellect is the highest value and the social level (of
    >which traditional Semitic religions are relics of) is subordinate to
    >it. But because intellect is a static level it is subordinate to MOQ's
    >DQ/SQ system. And this have put things in a new light; the
    >Semitic kind of religions are still a lower value level, but the MOQ
    >have reinstated GOOD as the central issue.

    Ignore last post. I stated it incorrectly.
    Greetings,

    Bo, I find your post very interesting. I would like to hear about GOOD as
    a noun rather than an adjective. It would seem to me that as a NOUN, GOOD
    drops the subjectivity to become systems of preference or probability in a
    much more objective way?

    I know I'm thinking above my pay scale, but it's what I think about.

    MarshaV

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 18 2005 - 09:34:22 BST